Case summary

A 1950s snapshot of the Cooper family's first dinner in their new Texas house captured a body plunging from the ceiling that nobody at the table saw.

Verdict: Hoax

The Texas story was invented around 2013 for an image that surfaced online in 2009 as horror art; the man who says he made it in 1981 has described the technique.

A grainy black-and-white photograph shows two women and two small boys at a candle-lit table while an inverted human figure appears to fall beside them. From about 2013 it circulated with a tale that the Cooper family of Texas took it on their first night in a new home in the 1950s. The image is first found online in November 2009 on a horror-fiction forum, the family in it later said their name was Copper and the original had no figure, and artist Richard G. Ramsdell says he made it in 1981 by projecting the family slide onto his own body.

Do you believe it?

Be the first to vote.

An early-twentieth-century double-exposure "spirit" photograph by G. S. Smallwood of Chicago, showing a girl surrounded by faint figures

Photo: Miscellaneous Items in High Demand, PPOC, Library of Congress, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons Source

The picture is small, square and badly reproduced, which is part of its appeal. Two women, perhaps a mother and grandmother, sit at a dining table with a young boy on each lap. There are three lit candles, a cloth, cups and curtains behind. Above the candles hangs a pale human figure, head down, as if dropping from the ceiling into the room. Nobody at the table reacts. For well over a decade it has appeared on lists of “photographs that cannot be explained” under the name of the Cooper family.

What happened

The story attached to it runs like this: sometime in the 1950s the Coopers bought an old house in Texas; on their first evening the father photographed his wife, his mother and the children at the table; nothing seemed wrong until the film came back with the body in it. Retellings add details, including whether the house was bought or inherited, years of nightmares for the boys and a family that eventually fled. None of the versions gives a town, a date or a first name, and no newspaper, record or relative has ever been found to match.

The image itself has a traceable history, and it is a short one. Alex Boese of the Museum of Hoaxes, writing in October 2014, found its earliest online appearance on November 14, 2009, when a member of the forum at ligotti.net, a site devoted to the horror writer Thomas Ligotti, posted it in the art section under the title “Family Gathering”. The poster later said he had copied it from a Something Awful thread in which members shared creepy pictures and had no hand in making it. In April 2010 the paranormal blog Ghost Theory put it in a gallery of vintage oddities, and from there it spread. The Texas family and their new house, Boese concluded, were bolted on around 2013.

The investigation

Boese pointed to the too-even darkening of the corners, which looks like a software vignette, and to the figure’s shadow, which falls against the direction of the main light. In January 2015 Mick West opened a thread on the Metabunk forum and argued that the image was a composite of a real family photo and a second picture, possibly of a dancer, noting that the candles and the figure cast shadows while the people do not. In May 2015 a man calling himself Robert Copper joined the thread to say that he and his brother were the two boys, that the photo dated from 1959, that the family name was Copper rather than Cooper, and that the original contained no falling figure. West verified this privately against a color slide of the same table and curtains, and renamed the thread.

A fuller account arrived later. The artist Richard G. Ramsdell has said that he is the younger of the two boys and that he produced the image in 1981 for his master’s thesis show. He loaded the old family slide into a projector upside down, stood in the beam in pale clothing so that the scene fell across his body, and photographed projection and body together in a single exposure; turned the right way up, the family sat normally and he hung inverted beside them. The idea, he says, came from a dream a few days after John Lennon was shot in December 1980, about danger present in a room before anyone notices. He believes the picture was lifted from an early website of his in the late 1990s, and he lists it in his catalog as work 1981-24.

The explanations

Ramsdell’s method accounts for what puzzled the first investigators: a projected scene photographed in a studio produces real shadows and distortion rather than the clean edges of a cut-and-paste, which is why the body never looked quite like a digital insertion. Boese’s guess that the piece was made with software was wrong in detail but right in substance. Whether or not every element of the artist’s account can be checked, the two independent claims from people in the photograph agree on the essentials: the family picture is real, it dates from 1959, and the falling figure was added long afterward.

Where it stands

The photograph still circulates with the Cooper story, usually without the correction. There was no Cooper family, no Texas house and no night of terror. There was a family snapshot, a graduate student with a slide projector, a horror forum, and an internet that prefers a ghost to an artist.

Case file

Verdict
Verdict: Hoax
Status
Solved
Phenomenon
Spontaneous Images
Date
November 14, 2009 to 2013
Evidence
Photograph
Investigated by
Alex Boese, Museum of Hoaxes (2014); Mick West and Metabunk forum (2015)
Case ID
UX-0786
Last updated

References

  1. The Cooper Family Falling Body Photo Alex Boese, The Museum of Hoaxes, 2014-10-27 Website
  2. Debunked: Cooper/Copper family ghost photo Mick West, Metabunk, 2015-01-10 Website
  3. Encyclopaedia of the Impossible: The Cooper Family Falling Body (And) Photograph Lucia Peters, The Ghost In My Machine, 2017-02-20 Website
  4. Cooper Family Falling Body Photo: The True Story Behind the Famous Ghost Image Haunted Walk Website

Reader reports

What readers have seen, heard or found since. Reports are read before they appear and may be used in a video.

No reader reports yet. Seen something? You could be the first.

Have you seen it? Send a report
Shown as an initial.
Never shown. Only if we need to follow up.