Case summary

The pathologist who performed Einstein's autopsy in 1955 secretly kept his brain, held on to it for decades, and studies of it later showed what made Einstein a genius.

Verdict: True

The removal and Thomas Harvey's 40-year custody are well documented. The scientific findings are real but contested: one brain cannot show what caused genius, and critics have found serious flaws in the best-known studies.

When Albert Einstein died in Princeton in April 1955, the hospital pathologist Thomas Harvey removed his brain during the autopsy, apparently without prior permission, and had it cut into about 240 blocks. In 1978 a reporter found the pieces in jars in a cider box, still in Harvey's keeping in Wichita, Kansas. Studies from 1985 onward reported unusual glial cells, parietal lobes and folding, but critics say a single brain proves little. The remains are now divided among museums and collections.

Do you believe it?

Be the first to vote.

Black-and-white portrait of Albert Einstein photographed by Orren Jack Turner in Princeton, New Jersey

Photo: Photograph by Orren Jack Turner, Princeton, N.J. Modified with Photoshop by PM_Poon and later by Dantadd., Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons Source

Albert Einstein died at Princeton Hospital in New Jersey early on April 18, 1955, aged 76, after an aortic aneurysm ruptured. He had asked to be cremated, and that afternoon his body was burned in Trenton and his ashes scattered. His brain was not with it. During the autopsy that morning the hospital’s pathologist, Thomas Stoltz Harvey, had removed it, and for most of the next half century it stayed in his keeping.

What happened

Harvey weighed the brain, photographed it from many angles and fixed it in formalin. He then took it to the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, where technicians with a specialist cutting machine divided it into about 240 small blocks, set them in a gel-like embedding material and cut thin sections for microscope slides. Some slides went to other researchers; most of the material stayed with Harvey.

Whether anyone had agreed to this is still argued. An early biography said Einstein had wanted his brain studied, but later research found no sign that he or his family approved beforehand. Einstein’s elder son, Hans Albert, accepted the removal after the fact, on condition that any results appear in serious scientific journals. Harvey said he meant to organize that research. Nothing was published for almost thirty years, and by the 1970s he no longer worked at the hospital.

Decades of custody

The brain dropped out of view until 1978, when Steven Levy, then an editor at New Jersey Monthly, set out to learn what had become of it. He traced Harvey to Wichita, Kansas, where the pathologist eventually showed him the preserved pieces, preserved in two large jars inside a cider box. In the years after Levy’s article, researchers began writing to Harvey for samples.

In 1997 the writer Michael Paterniti drove Harvey and part of the brain across the country, a journey he described in the book Driving Mr. Albert. In 1998 Harvey handed what he still held back to Princeton. He died in 2007, and in 2010 his heirs gave his photographs, slides and a guide to the sectioning to the US military’s National Museum of Health and Medicine in Silver Spring, Maryland. A separate box of slides, passed down from the neuropathologist who had helped section the brain, reached the Mütter Museum in Philadelphia, which has displayed them since 2013. A Rutgers neurologist, Frederick Lepore, helped bring forgotten photographs held by Harvey’s companion to light around the same time.

The studies

The first major paper, by Marian Diamond’s group at the University of California, Berkeley, appeared in 1985. Counting cells in four small samples, it reported that one area of Einstein’s left parietal lobe had more glial cells, the brain’s support cells, relative to neurons than the same area in eleven men who had died at an average age of 64. In 1999 Sandra Witelson’s team at McMaster University in Ontario, working from Harvey’s 1955 photographs, reported in The Lancet that Einstein’s parietal lobes were unusually wide and that part of a common groove, the Sylvian fissure, was missing. Later, the anthropologist Dean Falk and colleagues used the newly released photographs to describe an unusually convoluted prefrontal cortex and other features, and a 2013 study reported unusually extensive connections through the corpus callosum, the bundle linking the two hemispheres.

The critics

The critics’ main objection is the sample size of one. Any single brain will differ from an average in many ways, so finding some differences in Einstein’s proves little unless they are predicted in advance. In 2014 the Pace University psychologist Terence Hines argued that the Diamond study had examined several different cell measures and reported only the ratio that came out significant, a textbook multiple-comparisons problem. He said the shape studies, too, had not shown that the features they described were more than normal variation, suggested the whole literature might reflect researchers finding what they expected, and proposed blind tests in which experts try to pick Einstein’s slides out from ordinary ones. Others have noted that Diamond’s control brains came from men more than a decade younger.

Where it stands

The basic story is not in doubt: Einstein’s brain was taken at autopsy, kept by Harvey for more than forty years and is now split among museums and collections. What the brain can tell anyone about genius is far less settled. No study has shown a feature that explains his work, and the most cited findings remain contested.

Case file

Verdict
Verdict: True
Status
Closed
Phenomenon
Medical Mystery, Relic
Site
Princeton Hospital, Princeton, New Jersey
Coordinates
40.3587, -74.6672
Date
April 18, 1955 to 2010
Witnesses
Thomas Stoltz Harvey; Otto Nathan (present at autopsy)
Evidence
Physical trace Photograph Document
Investigated by
Steven Levy, New Jersey Monthly (1978); Marian Diamond (1985); Sandra Witelson (1999); Dean Falk and Frederick Lepore (2012-13); Terence Hines (2014)
Case ID
UX-0826
Last updated

References

  1. The Search for Einstein's Brain Steven Levy, New Jersey Monthly (first published 1978), 1978-08 Newspaper
  2. Scientists Get A New Look At Einstein's Brain NPR, via GBH News, 2012-11-26 Website
  3. Rutgers professor pursues answers to what makes a genius Rutgers University, 2015-11-20 Website
  4. The Myth of Einstein's Brain? Neuroskeptic, Discover, 2014-05-25 Website
  5. How did slides of Albert Einstein's brain wind up in Philly? Michael Tanenbaum, PhillyVoice, 2015-04-18 Newspaper
  6. Brain of Albert Einstein Wikipedia Website

Reader reports

What readers have seen, heard or found since. Reports are read before they appear and may be used in a video.

No reader reports yet. Seen something? You could be the first.

Have you seen it? Send a report
Shown as an initial.
Never shown. Only if we need to follow up.